COMPARE
CMCOvsBYRN
Columbus McKinnon Corporation vs Byrna Technologies, Inc. — head-to-head fundamental comparison across 8 metrics.
Columbus McKinnon Corporation
Industrials
Byrna Technologies, Inc.
Industrials
METRIC-BY-METRIC BREAKDOWN
| METRIC | CMCO | BYRN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Score | 39 HIGH RISK | 87 EXCELLENT |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) Growth · 20% | 38 | 60 |
| Gross Margin Quality · 15% | 40 | 86 |
| Cash Runway Stability · 20% | 20 | 100 |
| Debt / Equity Stability · 10% | 0 | 97 |
| Price / Sales Valuation · 10% | 100 | 99 |
| Rule of 40 Quality · 10% | 53 | 88 |
| Insider Ownership Governance · 10% | 16 | 86 |
| Share Dilution (12M) Governance · 5% | 97 | 100 |
SCORE TREND
ANALYSIS
CMCO (Columbus McKinnon Corporation) scores 39 overall, earning a "HIGH RISK" grade, while BYRN (Byrna Technologies, Inc.) scores 87 with a "EXCELLENT" grade. BYRN leads by 48 points in our 8-metric fundamental analysis.
The largest gap between these two stocks is in debt-to-equity, where BYRN outscores its peer by 97 points. Both companies operate in the Industrials sector, and investors should consider these fundamental differences alongside broader market conditions and their own risk tolerance.
SmallCap Scanner scores are calculated from publicly available financial data and are updated monthly. Scores reflect fundamental quality, not price momentum. This comparison is for research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance and current fundamentals may not predict future results.
RELATED COMPARISONS· Industrials