ORGO Organogenesis Holdings Inc.
CATEGORY BREAKDOWN
METRIC BREAKDOWN
Revenue Growth (YoY)
Year-over-year revenue growth rate
> 50% strong
Gross Margin
Revenue retained after direct costs
> 50% strong
Cash Runway
Months of cash at current burn rate
> 24 months ideal
Debt / Equity
Total debt relative to shareholder equity
< 25% strong
Price / Sales
Market cap relative to trailing revenue
< 3x strong
Rule of 40
Growth rate plus operating margin
> 40 excellent
Insider Ownership
Percentage of shares held by insiders
> 20% strong
Share Dilution (12M)
Share count increase over last 12 months
< 5% ideal
SCORE HISTORY
RESEARCH NOTE
BUSINESS SUMMARY
Organogenesis is an advanced wound-care and regenerative-medicine company — the company develops and sells biological-tissue-based products that treat chronic wounds (diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, pressure ulcers), surgical wounds, and certain orthopedic-and-soft-tissue applications.
The product portfolio includes:
- Apligraf — bilayered living-cell skin-substitute for chronic wounds
- Dermagraft — cryopreserved fibroblast-derived dermal substitute
- NuShield, PuraPly AM, Affinity — placental-derived and amnion-based wound-care products
- TransCyte and adjacent products — additional advanced-wound-care products
Revenue is per-procedure product sales through specialty distributors to wound-care clinics, hospitals, surgical centers, and outpatient providers. Reimbursement is primarily through Medicare and commercial-payer codes with negotiated reimbursement rates.
MARKET OPPORTUNITY
The advanced wound-care market is structurally driven by chronic-disease prevalence:
- Diabetic foot ulcers — major addressable population; chronic-wound healing is slow without intervention
- Venous and pressure ulcers — adjacent chronic-wound categories
- Reimbursement-supported pricing — Medicare and commercial payers cover advanced-wound-care products under defined billing codes
Macro context: revenue growth of 17% YoY reflects steady-state market expansion combined with continued product-portfolio cross-sell.
REVENUE QUALITY
The economics reflect a specialty medical-product business:
- Gross margin 76% — high; reflects the proprietary-biological-product pricing
- Operating margin — TTM positive
- Revenue $563M TTM — substantial scale
- P/S ~0.6 — modest reflecting wound-care-category multiple compression and reimbursement-pressure pricing
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
The defensible asset is the multi-product wound-care portfolio plus the specialty-distribution-channel relationships:
- Multiple FDA-approved advanced-wound-care products with established physician-and-payer acceptance
- Specialty-distribution-channel relationships with wound-care-clinics and surgical-center operators
- Manufacturing-and-cryopreservation capability for living-cell products that takes years to develop
What it is not: a moat against larger advanced-wound-care competitors (3M-acquired KCI, Smith+Nephew, Mölnlycke). Organogenesis competes on product-portfolio breadth and specialty-distribution rather than scale.
GROWTH THESIS
Three things have to work:
- Wound-care market growth continues as diabetes prevalence and aging-population dynamics drive chronic-wound demand
- Reimbursement environment remains supportive — CMS payment policy decisions affect per-product pricing
- Cross-sell across the product portfolio — same physician customers can use multiple Organogenesis products across different clinical scenarios
KEY RISKS
Three specific risks:
-
Reimbursement compression. CMS or commercial-payer rate-setting decisions could compress per-product economics. Wound-care is a category that has periodically been targeted for cost-containment review.
-
Larger-competitor pricing pressure. 3M/KCI and other scaled competitors can sustain pricing pressure that compresses margin without volume change.
-
Product-mix shift toward lower-priced applications. Continued growth in lower-margin product categories at the expense of higher-margin lead products could compress blended margins.
VERDICT
The 79.6/100 score captures the multi-product portfolio quality and the chronic-wound-category structural-tailwind. The cheapness reflects wound-care-category multiple compression and reimbursement-pressure pricing.
For investors who want advanced-wound-care exposure with multi-product portfolio positioning at small-cap scale, ORGO is one of few liquid pure-plays. For investors needing scale or wanting to avoid healthcare-reimbursement-cycle exposure, the category-positioning is the structural constraint.
The single metric to watch next is product-mix and pricing-realization trends. Continued mix-stability and pricing-discipline support the multi-product thesis.
Report last updated: May 5, 2026
RELATED STOCKS
COMPARE ORGO WITH…
OR QUICK-COMPARE SECTOR PEERS
SCORE ALERT
Get notified when ORGO's score changes by 5+ points.
DATA INFO
Last updated: May 4, 2026
Sources: SEC EDGAR, Financial Modeling Prep, Yahoo Finance. Not financial advice.