NCM·Healthcare·$329M·#16 / 520 in Healthcare

ORGO Organogenesis Holdings Inc.

80SOLID

CATEGORY BREAKDOWN

GROWTH27
QUALITY84
STABILITY95
VALUATION100
GOVERNANCE98

METRIC BREAKDOWN

Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth rate

+16.8%
27

> 50% strong

Gross Margin

Revenue retained after direct costs

75.6%
100

> 50% strong

Cash Runway

Months of cash at current burn rate

109 months
100

> 24 months ideal

Debt / Equity

Total debt relative to shareholder equity

18.9%
85

< 25% strong

Price / Sales

Market cap relative to trailing revenue

0.6x
100

< 3x strong

Rule of 40

Growth rate plus operating margin

27
60

> 40 excellent

Insider Ownership

Percentage of shares held by insiders

47.6%
100

> 20% strong

Share Dilution (12M)

Share count increase over last 12 months

+0.8%
95

< 5% ideal

SCORE HISTORY

RESEARCH NOTE

BUSINESS SUMMARY

Organogenesis is an advanced wound-care and regenerative-medicine company — the company develops and sells biological-tissue-based products that treat chronic wounds (diabetic ulcers, venous ulcers, pressure ulcers), surgical wounds, and certain orthopedic-and-soft-tissue applications.

The product portfolio includes:

  • Apligraf — bilayered living-cell skin-substitute for chronic wounds
  • Dermagraft — cryopreserved fibroblast-derived dermal substitute
  • NuShield, PuraPly AM, Affinity — placental-derived and amnion-based wound-care products
  • TransCyte and adjacent products — additional advanced-wound-care products

Revenue is per-procedure product sales through specialty distributors to wound-care clinics, hospitals, surgical centers, and outpatient providers. Reimbursement is primarily through Medicare and commercial-payer codes with negotiated reimbursement rates.

MARKET OPPORTUNITY

The advanced wound-care market is structurally driven by chronic-disease prevalence:

  • Diabetic foot ulcers — major addressable population; chronic-wound healing is slow without intervention
  • Venous and pressure ulcers — adjacent chronic-wound categories
  • Reimbursement-supported pricing — Medicare and commercial payers cover advanced-wound-care products under defined billing codes

Macro context: revenue growth of 17% YoY reflects steady-state market expansion combined with continued product-portfolio cross-sell.

REVENUE QUALITY

The economics reflect a specialty medical-product business:

  • Gross margin 76% — high; reflects the proprietary-biological-product pricing
  • Operating margin — TTM positive
  • Revenue $563M TTM — substantial scale
  • P/S ~0.6 — modest reflecting wound-care-category multiple compression and reimbursement-pressure pricing

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

The defensible asset is the multi-product wound-care portfolio plus the specialty-distribution-channel relationships:

  • Multiple FDA-approved advanced-wound-care products with established physician-and-payer acceptance
  • Specialty-distribution-channel relationships with wound-care-clinics and surgical-center operators
  • Manufacturing-and-cryopreservation capability for living-cell products that takes years to develop

What it is not: a moat against larger advanced-wound-care competitors (3M-acquired KCI, Smith+Nephew, Mölnlycke). Organogenesis competes on product-portfolio breadth and specialty-distribution rather than scale.

GROWTH THESIS

Three things have to work:

  1. Wound-care market growth continues as diabetes prevalence and aging-population dynamics drive chronic-wound demand
  2. Reimbursement environment remains supportive — CMS payment policy decisions affect per-product pricing
  3. Cross-sell across the product portfolio — same physician customers can use multiple Organogenesis products across different clinical scenarios

KEY RISKS

Three specific risks:

  1. Reimbursement compression. CMS or commercial-payer rate-setting decisions could compress per-product economics. Wound-care is a category that has periodically been targeted for cost-containment review.

  2. Larger-competitor pricing pressure. 3M/KCI and other scaled competitors can sustain pricing pressure that compresses margin without volume change.

  3. Product-mix shift toward lower-priced applications. Continued growth in lower-margin product categories at the expense of higher-margin lead products could compress blended margins.

VERDICT

The 79.6/100 score captures the multi-product portfolio quality and the chronic-wound-category structural-tailwind. The cheapness reflects wound-care-category multiple compression and reimbursement-pressure pricing.

For investors who want advanced-wound-care exposure with multi-product portfolio positioning at small-cap scale, ORGO is one of few liquid pure-plays. For investors needing scale or wanting to avoid healthcare-reimbursement-cycle exposure, the category-positioning is the structural constraint.

The single metric to watch next is product-mix and pricing-realization trends. Continued mix-stability and pricing-discipline support the multi-product thesis.

Report last updated: May 5, 2026

COMPARE ORGO WITH…

ORGOvs

OR QUICK-COMPARE SECTOR PEERS

SCORE ALERT

Get notified when ORGO's score changes by 5+ points.

DATA INFO

Last updated: May 4, 2026

Sources: SEC EDGAR, Financial Modeling Prep, Yahoo Finance. Not financial advice.