EVER EverQuote, Inc.
CATEGORY BREAKDOWN
METRIC BREAKDOWN
Revenue Growth (YoY)
Year-over-year revenue growth rate
> 50% strong
Gross Margin
Revenue retained after direct costs
> 50% strong
Cash Runway
Months of cash at current burn rate
> 24 months ideal
Debt / Equity
Total debt relative to shareholder equity
< 25% strong
Price / Sales
Market cap relative to trailing revenue
< 3x strong
Rule of 40
Growth rate plus operating margin
> 40 excellent
Insider Ownership
Percentage of shares held by insiders
> 20% strong
Share Dilution (12M)
Share count increase over last 12 months
< 5% ideal
SCORE HISTORY
RESEARCH NOTE
BUSINESS SUMMARY
EverQuote runs an online insurance-comparison marketplace focused predominantly on auto-insurance, with smaller home-and-life-insurance verticals. Consumers fill out a quote questionnaire on the EverQuote properties; matching insurance carriers bid for the lead in real time; the user is routed to the winning carrier or to multiple carriers for direct quote follow-up.
EverQuote is not an insurer — no underwriting risk on its books. Revenue is per-lead pricing from insurance carriers, with rate set by real-time auction. The marketplace's value to carriers is the volume and quality of leads with high purchase intent.
MARKET OPPORTUNITY
The US auto-insurance shopping flow has been one of the most digitally-disrupted parts of insurance distribution. State-Farm and Geico still dominate via direct relationships, but the carrier auction model for digital leads has captured a meaningful share of new-policy acquisition.
Where EverQuote is exposed:
- Auto-insurance is the dominant vertical (>70% of revenue); carrier ad-spend follows the auto-rate cycle
- Home and life insurance are smaller but higher-margin lead types
- Direct-marketing-affiliate model — leads come from search ads, organic search, and partner traffic; CAC discipline is the dominant operational metric
Macro context: US auto-insurance carriers spent record marketing budgets through 2023-2024 as rate hikes drove new-policy shopping. By 2025, carrier marketing spend normalized lower as rate cycles cooled — that compresses lead-auction prices and is the primary cyclical headwind EverQuote faces.
REVENUE QUALITY
The numbers reflect a marketplace at strong commercial scale:
- Gross margin 96.6% — exceptional, among the highest in the small-cap universe; reflects the pure marketplace nature where cost-of-revenue is essentially data-pipeline-and-hosting
- Operating margin — moves with marketing efficiency; CAC is the swing variable, not gross margin
- Revenue growth 38% YoY on $693M TTM — reflects the recovery from a 2022-2023 trough when carrier marketing pulled back during a hard insurance cycle
- P/S ~0.7 — modest for a 38%-growth, 96%-gross-margin business; cheapness reflects cyclical-uncertainty premium
What hides in the data: revenue concentration in auto-insurance vertical. A single carrier's marketing-budget decision can move quarterly results meaningfully. Investors should track the disclosed carrier-concentration metric.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
The defensible asset is the lead-quality optimization layer plus carrier-relationship panel:
- Carrier-auction infrastructure with real-time bidding takes years to build and tune
- Lead-quality scoring (which leads convert at what rate per carrier) is proprietary and improves with scale
- Distribution partnerships with QuinStreet (QNST), MediaAlpha (MAX), and direct affiliates contribute lead inventory
What it is not: a moat against MediaAlpha (MAX) — the closest direct competitor, larger in revenue and similar in business model. Both compete for the same carrier ad-budgets. EverQuote differentiates more on lead-quality than on marketplace scale.
GROWTH THESIS
Three things have to work:
- Auto-insurance carrier marketing cycle stays favorable — rate-cycle drives carrier ad-budgets, which drives EverQuote's per-lead pricing and revenue. Below normal marketing-spend, the business compresses materially.
- Home and life verticals scale to reduce auto-cycle dependence. Both are still single-digit-percent contributions today.
- CAC discipline holds. Paid-search and affiliate costs have been rising; if EverQuote's CAC outpaces lead-revenue, operating margin gets pressured fast.
KEY RISKS
Three risks specific to this business:
-
Auto-insurance hard-market reversal. Carrier marketing budgets are the upstream variable. A new hard-market cycle (rate hikes + reduced acquisition) would directly compress lead-pricing — same scenario that hit EverQuote in 2022-2023.
-
MediaAlpha competitive pressure. MAX is a larger competitor on the same auctions. Direct head-to-head bidding-up of inventory is possible if MAX decides to defend or grow share.
-
Search-channel disruption. A meaningful share of EverQuote's lead volume comes from Google paid-search and SEO. A Google-algorithm change or search-CPC spike could compress the marketing-economics of the entire model.
VERDICT
The 88.2/100 score captures the genuine quality of a marketplace-economics business with high gross margin and a recovering revenue line. What the score under-weights is direct dependence on the auto-insurance pricing cycle, which is only partly within management's control.
For investors who want exposure to a recovery-stage marketplace at modest multiples and can underwrite cyclical carrier-spend risk, EVER is a credible name. For investors needing diversified revenue or counter-cyclical defensiveness, the cycle-exposure is disqualifying.
The single metric to watch next is per-lead pricing in the auto vertical quarter-over-quarter. Stable or rising pricing means the cycle is favorable; declining pricing 2 quarters in a row signals carriers are pulling back.
Report last updated: May 5, 2026
RELATED STOCKS
COMPARE EVER WITH…
OR QUICK-COMPARE SECTOR PEERS
SCORE ALERT
Get notified when EVER's score changes by 5+ points.
DATA INFO
Last updated: May 4, 2026
Sources: SEC EDGAR, Financial Modeling Prep, Yahoo Finance. Not financial advice.