NMS·Consumer Cyclical·$707M·#171 / 211 in Consumer Cyclical

FOXF Fox Factory Holding Corp.

48SPECULATIVE

CATEGORY BREAKDOWN

GROWTH8
QUALITY37
STABILITY70
VALUATION100
GOVERNANCE38

METRIC BREAKDOWN

Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth rate

+5.3%
8

> 50% strong

Gross Margin

Revenue retained after direct costs

30.2%
40

> 50% strong

Cash Runway

Months of cash at current burn rate

999 months
100

> 24 months ideal

Debt / Equity

Total debt relative to shareholder equity

102.9%
9

< 25% strong

Price / Sales

Market cap relative to trailing revenue

0.5x
100

< 3x strong

Rule of 40

Growth rate plus operating margin

9
33

> 40 excellent

Insider Ownership

Percentage of shares held by insiders

0.9%
7

> 20% strong

Share Dilution (12M)

Share count increase over last 12 months

-1.6%
100

< 5% ideal

SCORE HISTORY

RESEARCH NOTE

BUSINESS SUMMARY

Fox Factory designs and manufactures premium suspension components and bicycle components for performance vehicles and bicycles. The two primary business segments are:

  • Powered Vehicles — suspension systems for off-road trucks (Ford Raptor, Ranger Raptor, Bronco Raptor), UTVs (Polaris RZR, Can-Am Maverick, Yamaha YXZ), motorcycles, and snowmobiles
  • Specialty Sports — bicycle suspension (Fox Racing Shox brand) plus the Marucci Sports subsidiary which makes premium baseball bats and equipment

Revenue is product sales to OEM customers (Ford, Polaris, etc.) plus aftermarket-and-replacement parts sales plus end-consumer-direct via specialty retailers and dealers.

The strategic positioning is premium-quality across all categories — Fox Racing Shox is the de facto premium-suspension choice for high-performance bicycles; Fox truck-and-UTV suspension is similarly the OEM-default for performance off-road vehicles.

MARKET OPPORTUNITY

Fox Factory's end markets have distinct cycle dynamics:

  • Powered Vehicles segment is structurally tied to off-road truck-and-UTV demand cycles and OEM-program timing
  • Bicycle component segment has been highly cyclical — the post-pandemic bicycle-demand-bubble normalization has been challenging
  • Marucci Sports has steady through-cycle demand from baseball-and-softball-equipment buyers

Aggregate revenue therefore reflects multiple end-market dynamics simultaneously. The 2022-2024 period saw the bicycle-segment compression weighing on consolidated results; 2025 environment has been more stable with selective recovery.

REVENUE QUALITY

  • Gross margin 30% — moderate, characteristic of specialty-component manufacturing
  • Operating margin — variable with end-market cycles
  • Revenue ~$1.4B TTM
  • P/S ~0.5 — cheap reflecting end-market-cycle skepticism

Standard analytical framework: segment-mix-and-margin-trajectory rather than aggregate revenue growth. Powered Vehicles tend to provide stability; bicycle and Marucci move with their respective cycles.

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Fox Factory's defensible position rests on brand-and-quality-positioning across the premium-tier in multiple categories:

  • Fox Racing Shox brand recognition in mountain-biking and high-performance bicycle markets is genuinely durable
  • OEM-program-design-wins at Ford, Polaris, Can-Am create multi-year revenue tails through model-cycle production
  • Marucci-Sports premium-baseball-bat positioning is defensible against generic alternatives

Competition includes RockShox (SRAM-owned bicycle suspension), various motorcycle-suspension specialists, and premium-baseball-bat alternatives. None directly replicates Fox's multi-category premium-positioning.

GROWTH THESIS

The growth path requires three things working: continued OEM-design-wins on next-generation off-road performance vehicles, bicycle-cycle-recovery from the post-pandemic compression, and Marucci-Sports continued share-gain in premium-baseball-equipment.

Beyond core, ongoing M&A in adjacent specialty-component categories has been a longer-term growth driver.

KEY RISKS

  1. Bicycle-cycle persistence. If the post-pandemic bicycle-segment compression continues longer than expected, segment-level pressure on consolidated results continues.

  2. OEM-platform-cycle timing. Ford Raptor, Polaris RZR, and similar OEM-platform redesigns affect Fox revenue with multi-year lag; missing or delayed program-redesigns compress visibility.

  3. Premium-pricing pressure. Fox's economics depend on premium-pricing tier; consumer-discretionary compression that pushes buyers to mid-tier alternatives compresses margin without volume change.

VERDICT

Fox Factory is one of the more interesting premium-specialty-component companies in the public markets — multi-category brand strength with multi-year OEM-program visibility. The 47.6/100 score reflects end-market-cycle exposure more than structural quality.

For investors who want premium-specialty-manufacturing exposure with multi-end-market diversification and can tolerate cycle-driven volatility, FOXF is one of few liquid public-market vehicles. For investors needing scale or wanting low-volatility specialty-manufacturing, alternatives are appropriate.

Report last updated: May 5, 2026

COMPARE FOXF WITH…

FOXFvs

OR QUICK-COMPARE SECTOR PEERS

SCORE ALERT

Get notified when FOXF's score changes by 5+ points.

DATA INFO

Last updated: May 4, 2026

Sources: SEC EDGAR, Financial Modeling Prep, Yahoo Finance. Not financial advice.