COMPARE
NCIvsGAMB
Neo-Concept International Group vs Gambling.com Group Limited — head-to-head fundamental comparison across 8 metrics.
Neo-Concept International Group
SOLID
Consumer Cyclical
Gambling.com Group Limited
EXCELLENT
Consumer Cyclical
METRIC-BY-METRIC BREAKDOWN
| METRIC | NCI | GAMB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Score | 62 SOLID | 82 EXCELLENT |
| Revenue Growth (YoY) Growth · 20% | 56 | 27 |
| Gross Margin Quality · 15% | 28 | 100 |
| Cash Runway Stability · 20% | 100 | 100 |
| Debt / Equity Stability · 10% | 6 | 82 |
| Price / Sales Valuation · 10% | 100 | 100 |
| Rule of 40 Quality · 10% | 80 | 87 |
| Insider Ownership Governance · 10% | 75 | 100 |
| Share Dilution (12M) Governance · 5% | 0 | 100 |
SCORE TREND
ANALYSIS
NCI (Neo-Concept International Group) scores 62 overall, earning a "SOLID" grade, while GAMB (Gambling.com Group Limited) scores 82 with a "EXCELLENT" grade. GAMB leads by 20 points in our 8-metric fundamental analysis.
The largest gap between these two stocks is in share dilution, where GAMB outscores its peer by 100 points. Both companies operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, and investors should consider these fundamental differences alongside broader market conditions and their own risk tolerance.
SmallCap Scanner scores are calculated from publicly available financial data and are updated monthly. Scores reflect fundamental quality, not price momentum. This comparison is for research purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance and current fundamentals may not predict future results.
RELATED COMPARISONS· Consumer Cyclical